Telephone intercepts may have been critical in insider trading case

Via the BBC, this report on the Rajaratnam insider trading case in the Southern District of New York. The jury’s repeated reviews of wiretap evidence suggest, in our view, that the wiretap evidence was critical.

US hedge fund billionaire Raj Rajaratnam has been found guilty of making tens of millions of dollars from insider trading.

The unanimous verdict brings to an end a eight-week trial which is part of what prosecutors call the largest hedge fund insider trading case in history.

Central to the prosecution’s evidence were tapped phone calls between Rajaratnam and corporate insiders.  Rajaratnam faces between 15-and-a-half and 19-and-a-half years in jail.  He will be released on bail with an electronic tag until the sentencing date of 29 July, although prosecutors had asked for him to be kept in custody in the meantime.

Rajaratnam was found guilty on all of the 14 charges he faced, including five counts of conspiracy and nine of securities fraud.  The jury decision was postponed for several days after one juror fell ill and had to be replaced, forcing the jury to restart their deliberations from the beginning.

Jurors went back to the courtroom repeatedly during their deliberations to listen to sections of the 45 tapes of wire-tapped telephone calls.

Aggressive trading

Prosecutors argued Rajaratnam made as much as $63.8m (£39m) in illegal profits from 2003 to March 2009 by trading on tips from a network of highly-placed corporate insiders.   The companies traded included Google, Intel and Hilton Hotels, the prosecution said.  In his final closing arguments, Assistant US Attorney Jonathan Streeter said the Rajaratnam defence team wanted the jury to defy logic and common sense and ignore the evidence provided by dozens of recorded phone calls of illegal trading tips.

Galleon boss Rajaratnam found guilty of insider trading

 

Questions For Harry Markopolos – Math Is Hard – Interview – NYTimes.com

Excerpted from Questions For Harry Markopolos – Math Is Hard – Interview – NYTimes.com. Interview conducted by Deborah Solomon of The Times.

You met last year with Mary Schapiro, the current head of the S.E.C. How did that go?

I would say she was coldly polite. Her general counsel, David Becker, did most of the talking. He and I did not get along at all. He was getting ready to come across the coffee table and strangle me.

In the year since you testified before Congress about the S.E.C.’s failures, many of the agency’s employees have been replaced.

They’ve redisorganized. They redisorganized the enforcement unit. I actually approve of that. I think Robert Khuzami, the new head of the enforcement division, has got fire in his belly.

Are you saying the S.E.C. under Schapiro is about to catch fraud on Wall Street?

She has the wrong staff. They’re a bunch of idiots there.

What do you mean?

The five commissioners of the S.E.C. are securities lawyers. Securities lawyers never understand finance. They don’t have the math background. If you can’t do math and if you can’t take apart the investment products of the 21st century backward and forward and put them together in your sleep, you’ll never find the frauds on Wall Street.

So why doesn’t the S.E.C. hire finance people? Why don’t they hire you?

They’re overlawyered. They’re poisoned by lawyers.

You actually began your career as a money manager in Boston who first noticed Madoff’s monkey business when your boss told you to try and duplicate his investment returns. You realized they were mathematically impossible.

Madoff was a competitor of mine, and I couldn’t compete against him because he was making up his investment returns, and I had to manage according to the market. It wasn’t a level playing field.

What will you do with your book royalties?

Fund the three boys’ college educations. Harry Louie and Louie Harry are identical twins. Age 6. I have a 3-year-old as well.

Is that some kind of Greek tradition? Giving kids the same name?

You saw the movie “My Big Fat Greek Wedding”? Everybody has the same name. Only the people change; the names never do.

Has anyone contacted you about making a film based on your book?

Yes. All the major studios. Sony, Paramount, Tom Hanks, you name it.

Where did you learn about finance?

You don’t learn much in grad school. Half the formulas they teach you are false. It’s a lot of self-study. I read a lot of finance books, and I usually read them with a calculator because I go through the math to make sure I master the formulas.

Were you always a math whiz?

I needed a tutor in 7th and 8th grade. Whatever it was, I was having big problems with algebra.

via Questions For Harry Markopolos – Math Is Hard – Interview – NYTimes.com.

WNYC – The Leonard Lopate Show: No One Would Listen (March 09, 2010)

Leonard Lopate of WNYC interviews Harry Markopolos, who went to the SEC in 1999 requesting an investigation of Bernie Madoff:

Harry Markopolos talks about his years spent investigating Bernie Madoff and his $65 billion Ponzi scheme. While much has been written about Madoff's scam, few know how Markopolos and his team uncovered it years before it unraveled. In No One Would Listen: A True Financial Thriller, Markopolos details how the SEC missed red flags, how Madoff was able to pull off his scam, and what impact investigators will have on financial markets and financial regulation for decades to come

via The Leonard Lopate Show: No One Would Listen (March 09, 2010).

Markopolos is articulate about his reasonable fears that Madoff might retaliate.  Direct link to MP3 of interview on the Leonard Lopate show.